Aruba vs Czechia: Rule of Law - Governance estimate
Rule of Law - Governance estimate over time
- Aruba
- Czechia
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Czechia, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Czechia ahead.
Aruba ranks 25th and Czechia ranks 26th of 206 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8626 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1147 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9644 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3282 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, Aruba or Czechia?
- Aruba, at 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between Aruba and Czechia?
- 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Czechia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Czechia rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 25th and Czechia ranks 26th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.