Slovenia vs Togo: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Slovenia
1.65
in 2025
Togo
1.67
in 2025
Slovenia rank
17th
Togo rank
14th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Slovenia
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 1.67 against 1.65 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 17th and Togo ranks 14th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 9 and Togo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.431 | -2.09 | 2.52 | Slovenia |
| 1920s | -0.0433 | -2.09 | 2.04 | Slovenia |
| 1930s | -0.1912 | -2.09 | 1.9 | Slovenia |
| 1940s | -1.91 | -1.57 | 0.3348 | Togo |
| 1950s | -0.8102 | -1.04 | 0.2338 | Slovenia |
| 1960s | -0.178 | -1.41 | 1.23 | Slovenia |
| 1970s | -0.178 | -2.13 | 1.96 | Slovenia |
| 1980s | -0.0437 | -2.13 | 2.09 | Slovenia |
| 1990s | 2.07 | 0.4435 | 1.63 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 1.73 | 1.15 | 0.5767 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 1.52 | 1.78 | 0.2602 | Togo |
| 2020s | 1.33 | 1.67 | 0.3398 | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Slovenia or Togo?
- Togo, at 1.67 against 1.65 in Slovenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Slovenia and Togo?
- 0.02, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Togo?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Slovenia and Togo rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Slovenia ranks 17th and Togo ranks 14th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.