Myanmar vs Saudi Arabia: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Myanmar
-1.28
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
-1.4
in 2025
Myanmar rank
156th
Saudi Arabia rank
158th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Myanmar
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports -1.28 against -1.4 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.12.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1932 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 156th and Saudi Arabia ranks 158th of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 8 and Saudi Arabia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.0827 | -2.43 | 2.52 | Myanmar |
| 1940s | 0.36 | -2.43 | 2.79 | Myanmar |
| 1950s | 1.29 | -2.19 | 3.49 | Myanmar |
| 1960s | -0.7836 | -1.65 | 0.8624 | Myanmar |
| 1970s | -1.68 | -1.57 | 0.115 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1980s | -1.66 | -1.49 | 0.1707 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | -1.44 | -1.47 | 0.027 | Myanmar |
| 2000s | -1.24 | -1.28 | 0.0315 | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 1.01 | -1.4 | 2.41 | Myanmar |
| 2020s | -0.7877 | -1.34 | 0.556 | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Myanmar or Saudi Arabia?
- Myanmar, at -1.28 against -1.4 in Saudi Arabia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Myanmar and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.12, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Saudi Arabia?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1932 to 2025.
- How do Myanmar and Saudi Arabia rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Myanmar ranks 156th and Saudi Arabia ranks 158th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.