Myanmar vs Oman: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Myanmar
-1.28
in 2025
Oman
-1.26
in 2025
Myanmar rank
156th
Oman rank
155th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Myanmar
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports -1.26 against -1.28 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 156th and Oman ranks 155th of 175 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.01 | -2.04 | 2.05 | Myanmar |
| 1910s | 0.01 | -2.04 | 2.05 | Myanmar |
| 1920s | 0.01 | -2.04 | 2.05 | Myanmar |
| 1930s | 0.0682 | -2.18 | 2.24 | Myanmar |
| 1940s | 0.36 | -2.22 | 2.58 | Myanmar |
| 1950s | 1.29 | -2.08 | 3.37 | Myanmar |
| 1960s | -0.7836 | -2.32 | 1.54 | Myanmar |
| 1970s | -1.68 | -2.03 | 0.3477 | Myanmar |
| 1980s | -1.66 | -1.69 | 0.0363 | Myanmar |
| 1990s | -1.44 | -1.69 | 0.2522 | Myanmar |
| 2000s | -1.24 | -1.68 | 0.4345 | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 1.01 | -1.68 | 2.69 | Myanmar |
| 2020s | -0.7877 | -1.33 | 0.5438 | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Myanmar or Oman?
- Oman, at -1.26 against -1.28 in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Myanmar and Oman?
- 0.02, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Oman?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Myanmar and Oman rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Myanmar ranks 156th and Oman ranks 155th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.