Mauritius vs Sweden: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Mauritius
1.63
in 2025
Sweden
1.56
in 2025
Mauritius rank
19th
Sweden rank
21st
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Mauritius
- Sweden
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1.63 against 1.56 in Sweden, a difference of 0.07.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Sweden ahead.
Mauritius ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 21st of 175 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.403 | 0.7171 | 0.3141 | Sweden |
| 1910s | 0.403 | 0.8371 | 0.4341 | Sweden |
| 1920s | 0.583 | 1.08 | 0.4964 | Sweden |
| 1930s | 0.628 | 1.2 | 0.5715 | Sweden |
| 1940s | 0.7116 | 1.09 | 0.38 | Sweden |
| 1950s | 1.05 | 2.13 | 1.08 | Sweden |
| 1960s | 1.15 | 2.2 | 1.05 | Sweden |
| 1970s | 1.56 | 2.47 | 0.9135 | Sweden |
| 1980s | 1.56 | 2.7 | 1.15 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 1.56 | 2.42 | 0.8642 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 1.56 | 2.11 | 0.551 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 1.6 | 2.03 | 0.4283 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 1.37 | 1.74 | 0.3712 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Mauritius or Sweden?
- Mauritius, at 1.63 against 1.56 in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Mauritius and Sweden?
- 0.07, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sweden?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Sweden rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Mauritius ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 21st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.