Malta vs Nepal: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Malta
0.819
in 2025
Nepal
0.911
in 2025
Malta rank
62nd
Nepal rank
59th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Malta
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0.911 against 0.819 in Malta, a difference of 0.092.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 59th of 175 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.675 | -3.33 | 4.01 | Malta |
| 1910s | 0.675 | -3.33 | 4.01 | Malta |
| 1920s | 0.675 | -3.33 | 4.01 | Malta |
| 1930s | 0.675 | -3.33 | 4.01 | Malta |
| 1940s | 0.675 | -3.33 | 4.01 | Malta |
| 1950s | 0.675 | -0.9528 | 1.63 | Malta |
| 1960s | 0.675 | -1.53 | 2.21 | Malta |
| 1970s | 0.675 | -1.69 | 2.36 | Malta |
| 1980s | 0.7407 | -0.988 | 1.73 | Malta |
| 1990s | 0.894 | 0.4584 | 0.4356 | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.894 | 0.2161 | 0.6779 | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.816 | 0.4767 | 0.3393 | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.7872 | 0.3802 | 0.407 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Malta or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 0.911 against 0.819 in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Malta and Nepal?
- 0.092, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nepal?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Nepal rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Malta ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 59th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.