Libya vs Netherlands: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Libya
1.19
in 2025
Netherlands
1.18
in 2025
Libya rank
41st
Netherlands rank
43rd
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Libya
- Netherlands
How they compare
Libya currently reports 1.19 against 1.18 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Netherlands ahead.
Libya ranks 41st and Netherlands ranks 43rd of 175 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | -2.79 | 0.937 | 3.73 | Netherlands |
| 1940s | -2.79 | 0.642 | 3.43 | Netherlands |
| 1950s | -0.704 | 1.6 | 2.3 | Netherlands |
| 1960s | -0.7272 | 1.81 | 2.54 | Netherlands |
| 1970s | -2.46 | 2.17 | 4.62 | Netherlands |
| 1980s | -2.46 | 2.17 | 4.62 | Netherlands |
| 1990s | -1.89 | 2.17 | 4.06 | Netherlands |
| 2000s | -1.81 | 1.84 | 3.65 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 0.3868 | 1.66 | 1.28 | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 0.7967 | 1.9 | 1.11 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Libya or Netherlands?
- Libya, at 1.19 against 1.18 in Netherlands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Libya and Netherlands?
- 0.01, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Netherlands?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Netherlands rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Libya ranks 41st and Netherlands ranks 43rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.