Latvia vs Malawi: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Latvia
1.03
in 2025
Malawi
1.02
in 2025
Latvia rank
49th
Malawi rank
52nd
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Latvia
- Malawi
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.03 against 1.02 in Malawi, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Malawi ahead.
Latvia ranks 49th and Malawi ranks 52nd of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 7 and Malawi in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -1.8 | -0.871 | 0.9273 | Malawi |
| 1910s | -1.41 | -0.871 | 0.5354 | Malawi |
| 1920s | 1.11 | -0.871 | 1.99 | Latvia |
| 1930s | -0.1419 | -0.871 | 0.7291 | Latvia |
| 1940s | -3.2 | -0.8613 | 2.34 | Malawi |
| 1950s | -2.32 | -0.8349 | 1.49 | Malawi |
| 1960s | -1.79 | -1.5 | 0.297 | Malawi |
| 1970s | -2.25 | -2.81 | 0.5527 | Latvia |
| 1980s | -1.08 | -2.85 | 1.78 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 0.7438 | -0.7906 | 1.53 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.7954 | 0.7824 | 0.013 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.9029 | 1.04 | 0.1368 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 1.06 | 1.01 | 0.0455 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Latvia or Malawi?
- Latvia, at 1.03 against 1.02 in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Latvia and Malawi?
- 0.01, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malawi?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Malawi rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Latvia ranks 49th and Malawi ranks 52nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.