Kyrgyzstan vs Vietnam: Respect for Counterarguments Score

Kyrgyzstan
-0.571
in 2025
Vietnam
-0.635
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
142nd
Vietnam rank
144th

Respect for Counterarguments Score over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Vietnam
-3-2-101190019622025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports -0.571 against -0.635 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.064.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Vietnam ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 142nd and Vietnam ranks 144th of 175 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 4 and Vietnam in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Vietnam Difference Ahead
1970s -2.25 -1.55 0.7008 Vietnam
1980s -1.08 -0.8611 0.2152 Vietnam
1990s -0.4368 -0.605 0.1682 Kyrgyzstan
2000s -0.421 -0.5572 0.1362 Kyrgyzstan
2010s 0.818 -0.5682 1.39 Kyrgyzstan
2020s -0.2922 -0.8008 0.5087 Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Kyrgyzstan or Vietnam?
Kyrgyzstan, at -0.571 against -0.635 in Vietnam as of 2025.
What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam?
0.064, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 142nd and Vietnam ranks 144th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Respect for Counterarguments Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.