Hungary vs Iran: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Hungary
-0.233
in 2025
Iran
-0.221
in 2025
Hungary rank
130th
Iran rank
129th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Hungary
- Iran
How they compare
Iran currently reports -0.221 against -0.233 in Hungary, a difference of 0.012.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 130th and Iran ranks 129th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Iran in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Iran | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.2715 | -1.16 | 1.43 | Hungary |
| 1920s | 0.439 | -1.7 | 2.14 | Hungary |
| 1930s | 0.3105 | -1.66 | 1.97 | Hungary |
| 1940s | -0.8804 | -0.4343 | 0.4461 | Iran |
| 1950s | -2.47 | -0.6255 | 1.85 | Iran |
| 1960s | -2.46 | -1.54 | 0.9172 | Iran |
| 1970s | -1.57 | -1.36 | 0.21 | Iran |
| 1980s | -1.43 | 0.2099 | 1.64 | Iran |
| 1990s | 1.32 | 0.5467 | 0.7688 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1.06 | 0.734 | 0.321 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.1773 | 0.2682 | 0.0909 | Iran |
| 2020s | -0.2157 | -0.0287 | 0.187 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Hungary or Iran?
- Iran, at -0.221 against -0.233 in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Hungary and Iran?
- 0.012, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Iran?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Iran rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Hungary ranks 130th and Iran ranks 129th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.