Ghana vs Togo: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Ghana
1.8
in 2025
Togo
1.67
in 2025
Ghana rank
11th
Togo rank
14th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Ghana
- Togo
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 1.8 against 1.67 in Togo, a difference of 0.13.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 11th and Togo ranks 14th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 9 and Togo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -0.681 | -2.09 | 1.41 | Ghana |
| 1920s | -0.681 | -2.09 | 1.41 | Ghana |
| 1930s | -0.681 | -2.09 | 1.41 | Ghana |
| 1940s | -0.4875 | -1.57 | 1.08 | Ghana |
| 1950s | 0.6791 | -1.04 | 1.72 | Ghana |
| 1960s | -0.6113 | -1.41 | 0.794 | Ghana |
| 1970s | -1.07 | -2.13 | 1.06 | Ghana |
| 1980s | -1.86 | -2.13 | 0.2722 | Ghana |
| 1990s | 0.2519 | 0.4435 | 0.1916 | Togo |
| 2000s | 1.62 | 1.15 | 0.4686 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0.888 | 1.78 | 0.8927 | Togo |
| 2020s | 0.7527 | 1.67 | 0.9183 | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Ghana or Togo?
- Ghana, at 1.8 against 1.67 in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Ghana and Togo?
- 0.13, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Togo?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Togo rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Ghana ranks 11th and Togo ranks 14th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.