Ghana vs Morocco: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Ghana
1.8
in 2025
Morocco
1.7
in 2025
Ghana rank
11th
Morocco rank
12th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Ghana
- Morocco
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 1.8 against 1.7 in Morocco, a difference of 0.1.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 114 shared years of data; in 1912 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 11th and Morocco ranks 12th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 9 and Morocco in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -0.681 | -2.14 | 1.46 | Ghana |
| 1920s | -0.681 | -2.14 | 1.46 | Ghana |
| 1930s | -0.681 | -2.14 | 1.46 | Ghana |
| 1940s | -0.4875 | -2.14 | 1.65 | Ghana |
| 1950s | 0.6791 | -1.71 | 2.39 | Ghana |
| 1960s | -0.6113 | -1 | 0.3937 | Ghana |
| 1970s | -1.07 | -1 | 0.0677 | Morocco |
| 1980s | -1.86 | -0.771 | 1.09 | Morocco |
| 1990s | 0.2519 | -0.4824 | 0.7343 | Ghana |
| 2000s | 1.62 | 0.1805 | 1.44 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0.888 | 0.8437 | 0.0443 | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0.7527 | 1.7 | 0.9443 | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Ghana or Morocco?
- Ghana, at 1.8 against 1.7 in Morocco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Ghana and Morocco?
- 0.1, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Morocco?
- 114 years are reported by both, from 1912 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Morocco rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Ghana ranks 11th and Morocco ranks 12th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.