Gambia vs Moldova: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Gambia
1.34
in 2025
Moldova
1.31
in 2025
Gambia rank
36th
Moldova rank
37th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Gambia
- Moldova
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 1.34 against 1.31 in Moldova, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 36th and Moldova ranks 37th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 7 and Moldova in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.385 | -1.8 | 1.41 | Gambia |
| 1910s | -0.385 | -1.41 | 1.02 | Gambia |
| 1940s | -0.385 | -3.2 | 2.82 | Gambia |
| 1950s | -0.385 | -2.32 | 1.94 | Gambia |
| 1960s | -0.384 | -1.79 | 1.41 | Gambia |
| 1970s | -0.286 | -2.25 | 1.97 | Gambia |
| 1980s | -0.286 | -1.08 | 0.7903 | Gambia |
| 1990s | -0.9558 | 0.5096 | 1.47 | Moldova |
| 2000s | -1.39 | -0.0151 | 1.37 | Moldova |
| 2010s | -0.6322 | 0.9565 | 1.59 | Moldova |
| 2020s | 1.24 | 1.5 | 0.2652 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Gambia or Moldova?
- Gambia, at 1.34 against 1.31 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Gambia and Moldova?
- 0.03, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Moldova?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Moldova rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Gambia ranks 36th and Moldova ranks 37th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.