Gambia vs Jordan: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Gambia
1.34
in 2025
Jordan
1.35
in 2025
Gambia rank
36th
Jordan rank
35th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Gambia
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 1.35 against 1.34 in Gambia, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Gambia ranks 36th and Jordan ranks 35th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 10.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -0.385 | -0.151 | 0.234 | Jordan |
| 1930s | -0.385 | -0.151 | 0.234 | Jordan |
| 1940s | -0.385 | -0.151 | 0.234 | Jordan |
| 1950s | -0.385 | -0.0618 | 0.3232 | Jordan |
| 1960s | -0.384 | -0.082 | 0.302 | Jordan |
| 1970s | -0.286 | -0.082 | 0.204 | Jordan |
| 1980s | -0.286 | -0.0753 | 0.2107 | Jordan |
| 1990s | -0.9558 | 0.1712 | 1.13 | Jordan |
| 2000s | -1.39 | 0.457 | 1.85 | Jordan |
| 2010s | -0.6322 | 0.5046 | 1.14 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 1.24 | 1.09 | 0.1493 | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Gambia or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 1.35 against 1.34 in Gambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Gambia and Jordan?
- 0.01, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Jordan?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Jordan rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Gambia ranks 36th and Jordan ranks 35th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.