Gabon vs Uganda: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Gabon
0.301
in 2025
Uganda
0.355
in 2025
Gabon rank
98th
Uganda rank
96th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Gabon
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.355 against 0.301 in Gabon, a difference of 0.054.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1910 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 98th and Uganda ranks 96th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 8 and Uganda in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -2.16 | -2.42 | 0.264 | Gabon |
| 1920s | -2.16 | -2.42 | 0.264 | Gabon |
| 1930s | -2.16 | -2.42 | 0.264 | Gabon |
| 1940s | -0.6812 | -1.87 | 1.19 | Gabon |
| 1950s | 0.067 | -1.4 | 1.47 | Gabon |
| 1960s | -0.2683 | -0.1294 | 0.1389 | Uganda |
| 1970s | -1 | -3.19 | 2.19 | Gabon |
| 1980s | -1 | -0.1356 | 0.8694 | Uganda |
| 1990s | 0.8024 | 0.6632 | 0.1392 | Gabon |
| 2000s | 0.9296 | 0.881 | 0.0486 | Gabon |
| 2010s | 0.5206 | 0.8886 | 0.368 | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0.2703 | 0.593 | 0.3227 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Gabon or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0.355 against 0.301 in Gabon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Gabon and Uganda?
- 0.054, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Uganda?
- 116 years are reported by both, from 1910 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Uganda rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Gabon ranks 98th and Uganda ranks 96th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.