Finland vs Latvia: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Finland
1.03
in 2025
Latvia
1.03
in 2025
Finland rank
49th
Latvia rank
49th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Finland
- Latvia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 1.03 against 1.03 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 49th and Latvia ranks 49th of 175 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.3127 | -1.8 | 1.49 | Finland |
| 1910s | 0.4077 | -1.41 | 1.81 | Finland |
| 1920s | 1.85 | 1.11 | 0.736 | Finland |
| 1930s | 1.09 | -0.1419 | 1.23 | Finland |
| 1940s | 0.4173 | -3.2 | 3.62 | Finland |
| 1950s | 1.51 | -2.32 | 3.83 | Finland |
| 1960s | 0.6678 | -1.79 | 2.46 | Finland |
| 1970s | 0.7022 | -2.25 | 2.96 | Finland |
| 1980s | 1.93 | -1.08 | 3 | Finland |
| 1990s | 1.71 | 0.7438 | 0.9649 | Finland |
| 2000s | 1.74 | 0.7954 | 0.9466 | Finland |
| 2010s | 1.68 | 0.9029 | 0.7757 | Finland |
| 2020s | 1.48 | 1.06 | 0.4273 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Finland or Latvia?
- Finland, at 1.03 against 1.03 in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Finland and Latvia?
- 0, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Latvia?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Latvia rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Finland ranks 49th and Latvia ranks 49th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.