Fiji vs Nepal: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Fiji
0.91
in 2025
Nepal
0.911
in 2025
Fiji rank
60th
Nepal rank
59th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Fiji
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0.911 against 0.91 in Fiji, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 59th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 12 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.13 | -3.33 | 3.2 | Fiji |
| 1910s | -0.13 | -3.33 | 3.2 | Fiji |
| 1920s | -0.13 | -3.33 | 3.2 | Fiji |
| 1930s | -0.5398 | -3.33 | 2.79 | Fiji |
| 1940s | -1.33 | -3.33 | 2 | Fiji |
| 1950s | 0.5355 | -0.9528 | 1.49 | Fiji |
| 1960s | 0.792 | -1.53 | 2.33 | Fiji |
| 1970s | 1.61 | -1.69 | 3.3 | Fiji |
| 1980s | 1.24 | -0.988 | 2.23 | Fiji |
| 1990s | 1.16 | 0.4584 | 0.7051 | Fiji |
| 2000s | -0.2458 | 0.2161 | 0.4619 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.4995 | 0.4767 | 0.0228 | Fiji |
| 2020s | 0.7023 | 0.3802 | 0.3222 | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Fiji or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 0.911 against 0.91 in Fiji as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Fiji and Nepal?
- 0.001, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Nepal?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Nepal rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Fiji ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 59th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.