Croatia vs Suriname: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Croatia
0.761
in 2025
Suriname
0.715
in 2025
Croatia rank
67th
Suriname rank
70th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Croatia
- Suriname
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.761 against 0.715 in Suriname, a difference of 0.046.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Suriname ahead.
Croatia ranks 67th and Suriname ranks 70th of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -2.17 | -0.1293 | 2.04 | Suriname |
| 1950s | -0.8102 | 1.31 | 2.12 | Suriname |
| 1960s | -0.178 | 1.31 | 1.48 | Suriname |
| 1970s | -0.178 | 1.31 | 1.48 | Suriname |
| 1980s | -0.1348 | 0.4393 | 0.5741 | Suriname |
| 1990s | -0.5449 | 0.7422 | 1.29 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 1.01 | 0.705 | 0.3075 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.8722 | 0.705 | 0.1672 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.7783 | 0.715 | 0.0633 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Croatia or Suriname?
- Croatia, at 0.761 against 0.715 in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Croatia and Suriname?
- 0.046, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Suriname?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Suriname rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Croatia ranks 67th and Suriname ranks 70th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.