Croatia vs Singapore: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Croatia
0.761
in 2025
Singapore
0.788
in 2025
Croatia rank
67th
Singapore rank
65th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Croatia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.788 against 0.761 in Croatia, a difference of 0.027.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Singapore ahead.
Croatia ranks 67th and Singapore ranks 65th of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -2.17 | -0.4823 | 1.68 | Singapore |
| 1950s | -0.8102 | 1.53 | 2.34 | Singapore |
| 1960s | -0.178 | 0.0651 | 0.2431 | Singapore |
| 1970s | -0.178 | -0.098 | 0.08 | Singapore |
| 1980s | -0.1348 | 0.2695 | 0.4043 | Singapore |
| 1990s | -0.5449 | 0.637 | 1.18 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 1.01 | 0.637 | 0.3755 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.8722 | 0.8242 | 0.048 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.7783 | 0.791 | 0.0127 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Croatia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.788 against 0.761 in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Croatia and Singapore?
- 0.027, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Singapore?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Singapore rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Croatia ranks 67th and Singapore ranks 65th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.