Croatia vs Indonesia: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Croatia
0.761
in 2025
Indonesia
0.717
in 2025
Croatia rank
67th
Indonesia rank
69th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Croatia
- Indonesia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.761 against 0.717 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.044.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Indonesia ahead.
Croatia ranks 67th and Indonesia ranks 69th of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 4 and Indonesia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -2.17 | -0.0562 | 2.11 | Indonesia |
| 1950s | -0.8102 | 1.35 | 2.16 | Indonesia |
| 1960s | -0.178 | -0.3825 | 0.2045 | Croatia |
| 1970s | -0.178 | -1.3 | 1.12 | Croatia |
| 1980s | -0.1348 | -1.47 | 1.33 | Croatia |
| 1990s | -0.5449 | -0.8484 | 0.3035 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 1.01 | 2.39 | 1.38 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 0.8722 | 1.63 | 0.7602 | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 0.7783 | 1.18 | 0.4037 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Croatia or Indonesia?
- Croatia, at 0.761 against 0.717 in Indonesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Croatia and Indonesia?
- 0.044, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Indonesia?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Indonesia rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Croatia ranks 67th and Indonesia ranks 69th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.