Congo vs Slovakia: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Congo
-0.213
in 2025
Slovakia
-0.212
in 2025
Congo rank
128th
Slovakia rank
127th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Congo
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports -0.212 against -0.213 in Congo, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Slovakia ahead.
Congo ranks 128th and Slovakia ranks 127th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 6 and Slovakia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -1.64 | 0.8915 | 2.54 | Slovakia |
| 1920s | -1.64 | 0.622 | 2.27 | Slovakia |
| 1930s | -1.64 | 0.1291 | 1.77 | Slovakia |
| 1940s | -1.48 | -2.16 | 0.68 | Congo |
| 1950s | -1.16 | -2.94 | 1.77 | Congo |
| 1960s | 0.0561 | -2.61 | 2.67 | Congo |
| 1970s | -0.9342 | -2.94 | 2.01 | Congo |
| 1980s | -0.819 | -0.945 | 0.126 | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.5926 | 0.5689 | 0.0237 | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0535 | 1.53 | 1.48 | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 0.013 | 1.24 | 1.23 | Slovakia |
| 2020s | -0.1823 | 0.3295 | 0.5118 | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Congo or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at -0.212 against -0.213 in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Congo and Slovakia?
- 0.001, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Slovakia?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Slovakia rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Congo ranks 128th and Slovakia ranks 127th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.