Congo vs Hungary: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Congo
-0.213
in 2025
Hungary
-0.233
in 2025
Congo rank
128th
Hungary rank
130th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Congo
- Hungary
How they compare
Congo currently reports -0.213 against -0.233 in Hungary, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Hungary ahead.
Congo ranks 128th and Hungary ranks 130th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Hungary in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -1.64 | 0.2715 | 1.92 | Hungary |
| 1920s | -1.64 | 0.439 | 2.08 | Hungary |
| 1930s | -1.64 | 0.3105 | 1.95 | Hungary |
| 1940s | -1.48 | -0.8804 | 0.5976 | Hungary |
| 1950s | -1.16 | -2.47 | 1.31 | Congo |
| 1960s | 0.0561 | -2.46 | 2.51 | Congo |
| 1970s | -0.9342 | -1.57 | 0.6398 | Congo |
| 1980s | -0.819 | -1.43 | 0.6093 | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.5926 | 1.32 | 0.7229 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 0.0535 | 1.06 | 1 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.013 | 0.1773 | 0.1643 | Hungary |
| 2020s | -0.1823 | -0.2157 | 0.0333 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Congo or Hungary?
- Congo, at -0.213 against -0.233 in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Congo and Hungary?
- 0.02, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Hungary?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Hungary rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Congo ranks 128th and Hungary ranks 130th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.