Congo vs Egypt: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Congo
-0.213
in 2025
Egypt
-0.205
in 2025
Congo rank
128th
Egypt rank
126th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Congo
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports -0.205 against -0.213 in Congo, a difference of 0.008.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Egypt ahead.
Congo ranks 128th and Egypt ranks 126th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Egypt in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -1.64 | -0.233 | 1.41 | Egypt |
| 1910s | -1.64 | -0.233 | 1.41 | Egypt |
| 1920s | -1.64 | -0.233 | 1.41 | Egypt |
| 1930s | -1.64 | -0.233 | 1.41 | Egypt |
| 1940s | -1.48 | -0.233 | 1.24 | Egypt |
| 1950s | -1.16 | -0.8306 | 0.3339 | Egypt |
| 1960s | 0.0561 | -0.98 | 1.04 | Congo |
| 1970s | -0.9342 | -0.08 | 0.8542 | Egypt |
| 1980s | -0.819 | -0.08 | 0.739 | Egypt |
| 1990s | 0.5926 | -0.1047 | 0.6973 | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0535 | -0.3472 | 0.4007 | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.013 | -0.5248 | 0.5378 | Congo |
| 2020s | -0.1823 | -0.6858 | 0.5035 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Congo or Egypt?
- Egypt, at -0.205 against -0.213 in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Congo and Egypt?
- 0.008, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Egypt?
- 123 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Egypt rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Congo ranks 128th and Egypt ranks 126th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.