Chile vs Senegal: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Chile
1.97
in 2025
Senegal
1.97
in 2025
Chile rank
9th
Senegal rank
8th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Chile
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 1.97 against 1.97 in Chile, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 122 shared years of data; in 1904 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 9th and Senegal ranks 8th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 11 and Senegal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.191 | -1.09 | 1.29 | Chile |
| 1910s | 0.191 | -1.09 | 1.29 | Chile |
| 1920s | 0.0006 | -1.09 | 1.09 | Chile |
| 1930s | 0.896 | -1.09 | 1.99 | Chile |
| 1940s | 1.33 | -0.5644 | 1.9 | Chile |
| 1950s | 1.07 | 0.23 | 0.8376 | Chile |
| 1960s | 1.48 | 0.993 | 0.4858 | Chile |
| 1970s | -0.2983 | 1.01 | 1.31 | Senegal |
| 1980s | -0.8723 | 1.25 | 2.12 | Senegal |
| 1990s | 2.52 | 1.25 | 1.27 | Chile |
| 2000s | 1.7 | 1.18 | 0.5208 | Chile |
| 2010s | 1.66 | 1.15 | 0.5059 | Chile |
| 2020s | 1.92 | 1.43 | 0.4952 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Chile or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 1.97 against 1.97 in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Chile and Senegal?
- 0, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Senegal?
- 122 years are reported by both, from 1904 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Senegal rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Chile ranks 9th and Senegal ranks 8th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.