Canada vs Poland: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Canada
0.603
in 2025
Poland
0.624
in 2025
Canada rank
77th
Poland rank
76th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Canada
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.624 against 0.603 in Canada, a difference of 0.021.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 103 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Poland ahead.
Canada ranks 77th and Poland ranks 76th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 9 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.847 | 1.26 | 0.412 | Poland |
| 1920s | 1.45 | 0.8105 | 0.6375 | Canada |
| 1930s | 1.45 | -0.0024 | 1.45 | Canada |
| 1940s | 1.42 | -2.28 | 3.7 | Canada |
| 1950s | 1.72 | -2.43 | 4.15 | Canada |
| 1960s | 2 | -2.1 | 4.1 | Canada |
| 1970s | 1.71 | -2.3 | 4.01 | Canada |
| 1980s | 1.52 | -1.39 | 2.91 | Canada |
| 1990s | 1.35 | 2.15 | 0.7974 | Poland |
| 2000s | 1.09 | 1.3 | 0.2121 | Poland |
| 2010s | 1.15 | 0.7687 | 0.3772 | Canada |
| 2020s | 0.7202 | 0.322 | 0.3982 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Canada or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.624 against 0.603 in Canada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Canada and Poland?
- 0.021, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Poland?
- 103 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Canada and Poland rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Canada ranks 77th and Poland ranks 76th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.