Canada vs Mali: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Canada
0.603
in 2025
Mali
0.571
in 2025
Canada rank
77th
Mali rank
79th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Canada
- Mali
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0.603 against 0.571 in Mali, a difference of 0.032.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 77th and Mali ranks 79th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 12 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1.31 | -1.34 | 2.65 | Canada |
| 1910s | 1.05 | -1.34 | 2.38 | Canada |
| 1920s | 1.45 | -1.34 | 2.79 | Canada |
| 1930s | 1.38 | -1.34 | 2.72 | Canada |
| 1940s | 1.18 | -1.1 | 2.28 | Canada |
| 1950s | 1.72 | -0.749 | 2.47 | Canada |
| 1960s | 2 | -0.4417 | 2.44 | Canada |
| 1970s | 1.71 | -2.83 | 4.54 | Canada |
| 1980s | 1.52 | -2.04 | 3.55 | Canada |
| 1990s | 1.35 | 0.6675 | 0.6855 | Canada |
| 2000s | 1.09 | 1.12 | 0.0292 | Mali |
| 2010s | 1.15 | 0.9202 | 0.2257 | Canada |
| 2020s | 0.7202 | 0.6275 | 0.0927 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Canada or Mali?
- Canada, at 0.603 against 0.571 in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Canada and Mali?
- 0.032, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mali?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Canada and Mali rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Canada ranks 77th and Mali ranks 79th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.