Burundi vs Guinea: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Burundi
-0.317
in 2025
Guinea
-0.305
in 2025
Burundi rank
135th
Guinea rank
134th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Burundi
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports -0.305 against -0.317 in Burundi, a difference of 0.012.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 135th and Guinea ranks 134th of 175 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -1.83 | -3.14 | 1.31 | Burundi |
| 1920s | -1.83 | -3.14 | 1.31 | Burundi |
| 1930s | -1.83 | -3.14 | 1.31 | Burundi |
| 1940s | -1.83 | -2.88 | 1.05 | Burundi |
| 1950s | -1.83 | -2.11 | 0.2784 | Burundi |
| 1960s | -0.7101 | -2.68 | 1.97 | Burundi |
| 1970s | 0.6124 | -3.11 | 3.72 | Burundi |
| 1980s | 1.44 | -2.22 | 3.66 | Burundi |
| 1990s | 1.51 | -0.4381 | 1.94 | Burundi |
| 2000s | 1.25 | -0.6339 | 1.88 | Burundi |
| 2010s | -0.4484 | -0.4894 | 0.041 | Burundi |
| 2020s | -0.3643 | -0.3703 | 0.006 | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Burundi or Guinea?
- Guinea, at -0.305 against -0.317 in Burundi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Burundi and Guinea?
- 0.012, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Guinea?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Guinea rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Burundi ranks 135th and Guinea ranks 134th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.