Bhutan vs Norway: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Bhutan
2.48
in 2025
Norway
2.07
in 2025
Bhutan rank
4th
Norway rank
7th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Bhutan
- Norway
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 2.48 against 2.07 in Norway, a difference of 0.41.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Norway ahead.
Bhutan ranks 4th and Norway ranks 7th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 12.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -1.89 | 0.628 | 2.51 | Norway |
| 1910s | -1.7 | 0.628 | 2.33 | Norway |
| 1920s | -1.7 | 0.628 | 2.33 | Norway |
| 1930s | -1.7 | 0.628 | 2.33 | Norway |
| 1940s | -1.7 | 0.5616 | 2.26 | Norway |
| 1950s | -0.9629 | 2.12 | 3.08 | Norway |
| 1960s | -0.104 | 2.4 | 2.5 | Norway |
| 1970s | -0.104 | 2.4 | 2.5 | Norway |
| 1980s | 0.0764 | 2.4 | 2.32 | Norway |
| 1990s | 0.366 | 2.39 | 2.02 | Norway |
| 2000s | 1.24 | 2.39 | 1.14 | Norway |
| 2010s | 1.76 | 2.21 | 0.4426 | Norway |
| 2020s | 2.35 | 2.08 | 0.2665 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Bhutan or Norway?
- Bhutan, at 2.48 against 2.07 in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Bhutan and Norway?
- 0.41, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Norway?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Norway rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Bhutan ranks 4th and Norway ranks 7th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.