Austria vs Barbados: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Austria
1.18
in 2025
Barbados
1.24
in 2025
Austria rank
42nd
Barbados rank
39th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Austria
- Barbados
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 1.24 against 1.18 in Austria, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 101 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 42nd and Barbados ranks 39th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 8 and Barbados in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.841 | -0.716 | 1.56 | Austria |
| 1920s | -0.1396 | -0.49 | 0.3504 | Austria |
| 1930s | -1.04 | -0.264 | 0.7721 | Barbados |
| 1940s | 0.548 | 0.194 | 0.354 | Austria |
| 1950s | 0.548 | 0.194 | 0.354 | Austria |
| 1960s | 0.548 | 0.5244 | 0.0236 | Austria |
| 1970s | 1.33 | 0.607 | 0.7266 | Austria |
| 1980s | 1.53 | 0.607 | 0.923 | Austria |
| 1990s | 1.27 | 0.9006 | 0.3664 | Austria |
| 2000s | 1.34 | 1.46 | 0.1191 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 1.37 | 1.4 | 0.0265 | Barbados |
| 2020s | 1.29 | 1.41 | 0.1123 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Austria or Barbados?
- Barbados, at 1.24 against 1.18 in Austria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Austria and Barbados?
- 0.06, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Barbados?
- 101 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Barbados rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Austria ranks 42nd and Barbados ranks 39th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.