Angola vs Armenia: Respect for Counterarguments Score
Angola
-0.153
in 2025
Armenia
-0.12
in 2025
Angola rank
121st
Armenia rank
118th
Respect for Counterarguments Score over time
- Angola
- Armenia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports -0.12 against -0.153 in Angola, a difference of 0.033.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 121st and Armenia ranks 118th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 7 and Armenia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Armenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -1.53 | -2.02 | 0.491 | Angola |
| 1920s | -1.53 | -1.86 | 0.3326 | Angola |
| 1930s | -1.53 | -2.82 | 1.29 | Angola |
| 1940s | -1.53 | -3.2 | 1.67 | Angola |
| 1950s | -1.53 | -2.32 | 0.7916 | Angola |
| 1960s | -1.53 | -1.79 | 0.2615 | Angola |
| 1970s | -1.64 | -2.25 | 0.613 | Angola |
| 1980s | -1.66 | -1.08 | 0.5887 | Armenia |
| 1990s | -1.06 | -0.1362 | 0.9257 | Armenia |
| 2000s | -0.5665 | -0.2384 | 0.3281 | Armenia |
| 2010s | -0.2668 | 0.393 | 0.6598 | Armenia |
| 2020s | -0.0457 | 0.3448 | 0.3905 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher respect for counterarguments score, Angola or Armenia?
- Armenia, at -0.12 against -0.153 in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in respect for counterarguments score between Angola and Armenia?
- 0.033, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Armenia?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Armenia rank globally for respect for counterarguments score?
- Angola ranks 121st and Armenia ranks 118th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Respect for Counterarguments Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites acknowledge and respect counterarguments when considering important policy changes.