Sri Lanka vs Syrian Arab Republic: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 87th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4286 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5714 DB15-20 methodology | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Sri Lanka or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Sri Lanka, at 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Sri Lanka and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Sri Lanka and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 87th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.