Namibia vs Nigeria: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)

Namibia
1 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Nigeria
1 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Namibia rank
84th
Nigeria rank
84th

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time

  • Namibia
  • Nigeria
00.20.40.60.81200320112019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Nigeria, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 84th and Nigeria ranks 84th of 188 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s 1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology
2010s 1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Namibia or Nigeria?
Namibia, at 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Nigeria as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Namibia and Nigeria?
0 DB15-20 methodology, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Nigeria?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Namibia and Nigeria rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
Namibia ranks 84th and Nigeria ranks 84th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.