Mongolia vs Zambia: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- Mongolia
- Zambia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0 DB15-20 methodology against 0 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 166th and Zambia ranks 166th of 190 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0.9 DB15-20 methodology | 0.9 DB15-20 methodology | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Mongolia or Zambia?
- Mongolia, at 0 DB15-20 methodology against 0 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Mongolia and Zambia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Zambia rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Mongolia ranks 166th and Zambia ranks 166th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.