Republic of Moldova vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)

Republic of Moldova
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
7th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
7th

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0123200320112019

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Republic of Moldova ranks 7th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 7th of 191 countries.

Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 3 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology Republic of Moldova
2010s 3 DB15-20 methodology 1.8 DB15-20 methodology 1.2 DB15-20 methodology Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Republic of Moldova or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Republic of Moldova, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Republic of Moldova and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 DB15-20 methodology, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Republic of Moldova and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
Republic of Moldova ranks 7th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4). Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/moldova/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/moldova/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Republic of Moldova vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.