Mexico vs Taiwan Province of China: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- Mexico
- Taiwan Province of China
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Taiwan Province of China, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Taiwan Province of China has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 40th and Taiwan Province of China ranks 40th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Taiwan Province of China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Mexico or Taiwan Province of China?
- Mexico, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Taiwan Province of China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Mexico and Taiwan Province of China?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Taiwan Province of China?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mexico and Taiwan Province of China rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Mexico ranks 40th and Taiwan Province of China ranks 40th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.