Madagascar, Republic of vs Sierra Leone: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- Madagascar, Republic of
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Madagascar, Republic of currently reports 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Madagascar, Republic of ranks 86th and Sierra Leone ranks 86th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar, Republic of | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Madagascar, Republic of or Sierra Leone?
- Madagascar, Republic of, at 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Madagascar, Republic of and Sierra Leone?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Madagascar, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar, Republic of and Sierra Leone?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar, Republic of and Sierra Leone rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Madagascar, Republic of ranks 86th and Sierra Leone ranks 86th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.