Czechia vs Georgia: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- Czechia
- Georgia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Georgia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.
Czechia ranks 7th and Georgia ranks 7th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.29 DB15-20 methodology | 1.71 DB15-20 methodology | 0.4286 DB15-20 methodology | Georgia |
| 2010s | 2.9 DB15-20 methodology | 1.6 DB15-20 methodology | 1.3 DB15-20 methodology | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Czechia or Georgia?
- Czechia, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Czechia and Georgia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Georgia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Georgia rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Czechia ranks 7th and Georgia ranks 7th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.