Congo vs Namibia: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)

Congo
1 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Namibia
1 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo rank
84th
Namibia rank
84th

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time

  • Congo
  • Namibia
00.20.40.60.81200320112019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Namibia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 84th of 188 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology
2010s 1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Congo or Namibia?
Congo, at 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Congo and Namibia?
0 DB15-20 methodology, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
Congo ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 84th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.