Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Togo: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Togo
How they compare
Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Togo, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 86th and Togo ranks 86th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Democratic Republic of the Congo or Togo?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Togo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Togo?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Togo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Togo rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 86th and Togo ranks 86th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.