Austria vs Sweden: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)

Austria
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Sweden
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Austria rank
40th
Sweden rank
40th

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time

  • Austria
  • Sweden
00.511.52200320112019

How they compare

Austria currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 40th and Sweden ranks 40th of 190 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology
2010s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Austria or Sweden?
Austria, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Austria and Sweden?
0 DB15-20 methodology, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Sweden?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Austria and Sweden rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
Austria ranks 40th and Sweden ranks 40th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Sweden: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/austria/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/austria/sweden/">Austria vs Sweden: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.