Antigua and Barbuda vs South Sudan: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- South Sudan
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 87th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0.8 DB15-20 methodology | 0.2 DB15-20 methodology | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Antigua and Barbuda or South Sudan?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Antigua and Barbuda and South Sudan?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and South Sudan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and South Sudan rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 87th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.