Afghanistan vs Indonesia: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- Afghanistan
- Indonesia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Indonesia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 40th and Indonesia ranks 40th of 190 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1.71 DB15-20 methodology | 0.7143 DB15-20 methodology | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 1.2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0.8 DB15-20 methodology | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Afghanistan or Indonesia?
- Afghanistan, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Indonesia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Afghanistan and Indonesia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Indonesia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Indonesia rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Afghanistan ranks 40th and Indonesia ranks 40th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.