Lebanon vs Macau, China: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Lebanon
- Macau, China
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 8.3% against 7.4% in Macau, China, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Macau, China's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Macau, China ahead.
Lebanon ranks 38th and Macau, China ranks 41st of 156 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.6% | 18.3% | 6.8% | Macau, China |
| 2000s | 12.7% | 16.8% | 4.0% | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 10.8% | 11.1% | 0.3% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Lebanon or Macau, China?
- Lebanon, at 8.3% against 7.4% in Macau, China as of 2018.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Lebanon and Macau, China?
- 0.9%, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Macau, China?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Lebanon and Macau, China rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Lebanon ranks 38th and Macau, China ranks 41st of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of male enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of male pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.