Cyprus vs United Arab Emirates: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Cyprus
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 2.0% against 1.9% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 88th and United Arab Emirates ranks 90th of 156 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.3% | 6.0% | 3.7% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 2.6% | 1.2% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Cyprus or United Arab Emirates?
- Cyprus, at 2.0% against 1.9% in United Arab Emirates as of 2017.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Cyprus and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.1%, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and United Arab Emirates?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Cyprus and United Arab Emirates rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Cyprus ranks 88th and United Arab Emirates ranks 90th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of male enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of male pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.