Uganda vs Palestine, State of: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Uganda
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 1.3% against 1.3% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Uganda ranks 87th and Palestine, State of ranks 86th of 156 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.4% | 2.0% | 0.4% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 1.8% | 0.3% | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Uganda or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 1.3% against 1.3% in Uganda as of 2018.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Uganda and Palestine, State of?
- 0.0%, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Uganda and Palestine, State of rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Uganda ranks 87th and Palestine, State of ranks 86th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of female repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of female enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of female repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of female pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.