Uganda vs Uzbekistan, Republic of: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Uganda
- Uzbekistan, Republic of
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.5 DB15-20 methodology against 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, Republic of, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Uzbekistan, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Uganda ranks 88th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 88th of 190 countries.
Uzbekistan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Uzbekistan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0.4286 DB15-20 methodology | 0.4286 DB15-20 methodology | Uzbekistan, Republic of |
| 2010s | 0.3 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.2 DB15-20 methodology | Uzbekistan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), Uganda or Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- Uganda, at 0.5 DB15-20 methodology against 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between Uganda and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Uganda and Uzbekistan, Republic of rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
- Uganda ranks 88th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 88th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.