Thailand vs United States of America: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Thailand
- United States of America
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in United States of America, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Thailand ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 190 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | United States of America |
| 2010s | 2.65 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 0.35 DB15-20 methodology | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), Thailand or United States of America?
- Thailand, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between Thailand and United States of America?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and United States of America?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Thailand and United States of America rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
- Thailand ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.