Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)

Saint Kitts and Nevis
1 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
1 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
57th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
57th

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.20.40.60.81200320112019

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 57th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 57th of 190 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology
2010s 0.6 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 0.4 DB15-20 methodology Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0 DB15-20 methodology, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 57th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 57th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/reorganization-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/st-kitts-and-nevis/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/reorganization-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/st-kitts-and-nevis/tanzania/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.