South Africa vs Taiwan, China: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time
- South Africa
- Taiwan, China
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.5 DB15-20 methodology against 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in Taiwan, China, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Taiwan, China has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 88th and Taiwan, China ranks 88th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Taiwan, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), South Africa or Taiwan, China?
- South Africa, at 0.5 DB15-20 methodology against 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in Taiwan, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between South Africa and Taiwan, China?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Taiwan, China?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Taiwan, China rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
- South Africa ranks 88th and Taiwan, China ranks 88th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.