Nigeria vs Vanuatu: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)

Nigeria
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Vanuatu
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Nigeria rank
133rd
Vanuatu rank
133rd

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time

  • Nigeria
  • Vanuatu
00.20.40.60.81200320112019

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0 DB15-20 methodology against 0 DB15-20 methodology in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.

Nigeria ranks 133rd and Vanuatu ranks 133rd of 188 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology
2010s 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), Nigeria or Vanuatu?
Nigeria, at 0 DB15-20 methodology against 0 DB15-20 methodology in Vanuatu as of 2019.
What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between Nigeria and Vanuatu?
0 DB15-20 methodology, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Vanuatu?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Nigeria and Vanuatu rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
Nigeria ranks 133rd and Vanuatu ranks 133rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.